Flying Car by Volante Aircraft
Flying Car, You now have more headroom
Home | New! | The Volante | KP Rice | History | Program | Contact KP | Links  
 
Enthusiasts: Answer our survey and reserve a discount!

 

Home of Volante, the Flying Car
What's New with the Volante Flying Car
The Volante Flying Car
KP Rice
History of Volante, the Flying Car
The Volante Program
The OV-10 Story
Light Light Support Aircraft
Contact KP
Flying links

 

 

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

What most closely matches your initial thoughts on a flying car?:

I'll be the first in line.

I'm certainly interested.

Intriguing... maybe.

You gotta show me.

No way, I'm into airplanes.
Comments:
Please do not enter a URL

May I contact you?
Email address:
(Used to reply to your interest. Not shared with anyone.)


Enter Security Code

security image
 


Thank you
KP Rice

The Program continued
This brings us down to two types of flying cars, for both of which airfields figure into some phase of their usage:

1. The "leave-a-piece-at-the-airport" (LPA) type of flying car; which leaves the flight component at the airport when the car drives away. You must return to the same landing place to fly again.

2. The "take-it-all-with-you" (TAW) flying car, which does just as its title suggests. Post landing, in some fashion, all of the parts go with you, so that you can travel to another airport to continue your flight again.

There are two types of vehicle in this latter category. I borrow Lionel Salisbury's "Roadable Times" definitions here:

a. The integrated flying car with wings and empennage that fold and store aboard, plus a prop that is simply stopped and disengaged, leaving you to essentially drive an entire, albeit folded up, airplane on the highway.

b. The modular flying car. In this case the car becomes just a car. The flight component lifts off to wait at the airport until you return or it folds into a trailer or some such appendage and can conveniently be left behind or taken with you.

First, Consider the LPA flying car
This machine is less complex to build, requires fewer licenses to operate, and may well satisfy some people's needs. You are still stuck with hangar or tie-down rent and significant operating restrictions, such as how to get it to the airport initially, and always having to return to the same airport to continue your journey by air. These limitations are not applicable to the next category under discussion.

Next, the TAW flying car category

The integrated machine
This is basically a folded up airplane for highway travel. This machine sounds ideal, however it too has some penalties. One of these depends on the sophistication of the designer (spell sophistication as complexity and cost in almost all of the units I've seen). It is relatively easy to conceptualize such a design but far more difficult to practically deal with the machinery to make it happen reliably as well as the conflicting CG requirements of a car and an aircraft, fuel storage space and so forth. I now have what I consider to be a practical solution for this design, but, although easier to convert, it still doesn't fit with my view that most users will undoubtedly be driving a lot more than they are flying and thus will be better served with an immediately available, more practical highly economical car,(60 to 80 mpg) that does not expose the entire airframe too "expensive to repair" highway damage.

As Paul Poberezny said in April 1976:

"All who have owned airplanes know that their investment sits on the ground probably more than 95% of its lifetime, either in the hangar or tied down out in the elements. As I have often said, one must have a strong love for aviation to tolerate such a vehicle."

Why not get some usefulness out of your investment when it isn't flying?

The modular flying car
I chose this for the Volante for several reasons. I didn't think the world was ready for the integrated machine on an economic basis. It may well be that unit production cost at 100,000 vehicles or more per year will be low enough for a large number of pilots to own, but it will be some time before the market develops to that point. In fact, I chose the kit route for initial introduction because I think the flying car has to demonstrate its projected value before any entrepreneur will invest the magnificent sums required for automotive type serial production; which is the only other route I can see to really low cost airplanes.

We really need to learn the "real world" contribution a flying car makes within the aviation spectrum before we know what it should look like, how it will operate, what are its economies, all of its pros and cons, considered within an evolutionary framework which simultaneously deals with necessary regulatory and facility changes. Incidentally, with all of these uncertainties, my hat is off to the current group of entrepreneurs working on such machines. We each think that we know what the market needs and we may all be right for the segment to which we cater.

<< Back     Continue>>

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Volante Aircraft


This site was created on August 17, 2002 | Copyright ©2002-
Fatal error: Call to undefined function: date_default_timezone_set() in /home/lotio3/public_html/volanteaircraft/includes/boiler.php on line 10